Aurizon asserts that Macquarie has been given more time to obtain approval to purchase G-W`s rail assets from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), with macquarie being cleared for six weeks from August 4, when Macquarie entered into a sales contract with G-W. G-W owns 51.1 per cent of its Australian rail operations. , the rest has been held since 2016 by a consortium of funds and clients managed by MIRA. Aurizon asserts that it has the first right to refuse any sale of the local G-W train operation on the basis of an agreement reached in 2006 when it purchased certain railway facilities in Western Australia, which were then owned by g-W and Wesfarmers. The offer was open until September 5, but on August 30, Aurizon informed G-W that its commercial terms were not identical to those offered to Macquarie and that it was therefore contrary to the 2006 agreement. “Aurizon employees voted in favour of a new Coal Enterprise agreement,” Aurizon said Monday in an email to S-P Global Platts. “81.2% of the workers covered by the proposed agreement voted `yes` in the 19 July vote. Aurizon, Australian coal railway workers end a dispute over enterprise agreement There have been numerous instances where FWC members refused to terminate the EAS when an employer asked them to do so. However, this decision is a positive development for employers who wish to denounce enterprise agreements that no longer correspond to the current economic climate and its operating environment. Aurizon filed a complaint in mid-September in the NSW Supreme Court alleging that G-W, based in the United States, had violated the agreements by agreeing to sell its Australian rail facilities to Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets (MIRA) and the Dutch pension fund PGGM after reaching a US $US$8.4 billion (US$12.2 billion) agreement in July.
, which should be taken over by Brookfield Infrastructure and GIC. Despite strong opposition from trade unions and workers, the Fair Labour Commission (FWC) authorized the termination of 12 enterprise agreements that had passed its expiry date, while the parties negotiated a new agreement. We are debating the decision of the Aurizon Operations Limited Commission; Aurizon Network Pty Ltd; Australian Eastern Railroad Pty Ltd  FWCFB 540 and its impact on employers in a nutshell below. Aurizon also submits that if it had purchased the G-W`s interest, it would not have been able to enter into the partnership agreement between G-W and Macquarie in 2016 due to restrictions on the transfer of partnership interests. It accuses G-W of violating the terms of the 2006 Aurizon rights agreement with Macquarie in 2016. Sydney – A dispute between Australian rail operator Aurizon and unionized workers in the country`s largest coal export rail system over a coal company that has resulted in various union actions is closed. The new Enterprise Agreement (EA) ended a dispute that, late last year and earlier this year, led to sporadic strikes at the Central Queensland Coal Network. The conflict began before Christmas, the last trade union actions resulted in mid-March. Aurizon was officially known as QR National before being privatized in 2010. Aurizon submitted a request to the FWC for the termination of 12 Enterprise Agreements (ETAs) following an impasse in which negotiations ended up in a deadlock. The EAs had been negotiated prior to the privatization process and contained a series of generous “league provisions” that reflected government policies of the time.